Argumentation and Clarification in Requirements Engineering
Période
depuis 2006
Description
Representation and reasoning about goals of an information system unavoidably involve the transformation of unclear stakeholder requirements into an instance of a goal model. If the requirements engineer does not justify why one clear form of requirements is chosen over others, the subsequent modeling decisions cannot be justified either. If arguments for clarification and modeling decisions are instead explicit, justifiably appropriate instances of goal models can be constructed and additional analyses applied to discover richer sets of requirements. We propose concepts, methods, and tools for performing structured argumentation, justification and clarification of modeling decisions during requirements engineering.
Unités
Axes de recherche
Staff
Responsable(s) |
|||
| Stephane FAULKNER | Responsable | 081/724877 | |
Personnel scientifique |
|||
| Ivan JURETA | Chercheur | 081/724888 | |
Publications (7)
Articles de périodique
Ivan JURETA, Stephane FAULKNER, Pierre-Yves SCHOBBENS
John MYLOPOULOS, Ivan JURETA, Stephane FAULKNER
Stephane FAULKNER, Ivan JURETA
Ivan JURETA, Stephane FAULKNER, Pierre-Yves SCHOBBENS
Actes de colloques
Ivan JURETA, Stephane FAULKNER, Pierre-Yves SCHOBBENS
Ivan JURETA, Stephane FAULKNER, Pierre-Yves SCHOBBENS

