Argumentation and Clarification in Requirements Engineering

Duration

since 2006

Description

Representation and reasoning about goals of an information system unavoidably involve the transformation of unclear stakeholder requirements into an instance of a goal model. If the requirements engineer does not justify why one clear form of requirements is chosen over others, the subsequent modeling decisions cannot be justified either. If arguments for clarification and modeling decisions are instead explicit, justifiably appropriate instances of goal models can be constructed and additional analyses applied to discover richer sets of requirements. We propose concepts, methods, and tools for performing structured argumentation, justification and clarification of modeling decisions during requirements engineering.

Research unit(s)

• PReCISE Research Center (PRECISE)
• Department of Business Administration (EGES)

Research theme(s)

• Requirements Engineering and Business-IT Alignment

Staff

Publications (7)

Papers

Conference Proceedings